Choose a recent (within the last 5 years) conference paper (10 pages, ± 2 pages), that is new to you, from ACM SIGCHI conferences ( including CHIPLAY ) . Critically read the paper and write a summary of it, according to Fong's alternative method for reviewing papers:
Your summary should be 750 words (± 10%).
Upload your document to URcourses.
|Criterion and Weight||(E)xcellent (3/3)||(S)atisfactory (2/3)||(P)oor (1/3)||(U)nacceptable (0/3)|
|1. Purpose (2.0)||Clearly articulates purpose of paper and convincingly argues about the authors' achievement of that purpose (2.0)||Clearly articulates purpose of paper and considers whether the authors' achieved that purpose (1.34)||Authors' purpose is somewhat clear but summary lacks consideration of whether that purpose was achieved (0.67)||Authors' purpose is not clear and achievement of purpose not clear (0.0)|
|2. Approach (2.0)||Authors' approach clearly stated and critiqued (2.0)||Authors' approach somewhat clearly stated and critiqued (1.34)||Authors' approach not clearly stated nor critiqued (0.67)||Authors' approach not stated nor critiqued (0.0)|
|3. Insights (2.0)||Insights are thoughtfully presented and explained (2.0)||Insights are presented and explained (1.34)||Insights are presented but not explained (0.67)||Insights are not presented nor explained (0.0)|
|4. Context and Impact (1.5)||Paper is clearly placed in context of related work and its impact is thoughtfully presented (1.5)||Paper is placed in context of related work and its impact is presented (1.0)||Paper is placed in context of related work but summary lacks consider of impact (0.5)||Paper is not placed in context of related work nor is impact considered (0.0)|