Mtg 6/26: Thu-25-Jan-2024

Outline for Today

Methods for Ethical Analysis

Administration

Response to Responses

groups that we have talked about in-class are for class discussions, we will use the same groups for the rest of the semester but we will not use the wiki to record group discussions going forward. Starting today, we have the groups set up in UR Courses and a blog for each group, which you can use to communicate your discussions and questions to the class. See your group

Today

methods for ethical analysis. From McConnell’s webinar video, is analysis sufficient?
- Webinar video
Logical fallacies
Tim Hortons app:

Summary

For Next Meeting

Wiki

Link to the UR Courses wiki page for this meeting

Media

Transcript

Audio Transcript

more to do with deciding which path is the right
path to go down for particular purpose. And this is something
where a lot of technical people get hung up, because they're so
focused on the analysis, that they don't look at the very top
decision to say, You know what, we can go deep in the tree, but
that very first decision was actually the one that was wrong.
And from a judgment point of view, we might very well have a
circumstance where any path on the right is better than any
path on the left. And further analysis on the details of the
path on the left is not going to change that fundamental
decision, because we actually, we actually made the right or
wrong decision at the very, very first decision on the tree. And
so this is something that a lot of technical people who are very
analytically focused, have a really hard time wrapping their
brains around. They have a hard time wrapping their brains
around the idea that in some cases, further analysis doesn't
matter, that it's okay to ignore detail, that more details are
actually not going to influence the overall outcome of the
decision. And so this would be characteristic of judgment, not
analysis of judgment to the degree that technical people are
uncomfortable with that good systematic of them,
overdeveloped analysis muscle and maybe an under job, judgment
muscle. So, what are the other interesting aspects of your
judgment is because we're so analysis heavy in software, we
often mistake analysis for judgment project, we will what
the circumstances are really the call for documents. We'll see if
any application analysis instead, and we'll make the best
judgment even though it's not. So example might be something
like criticize each of the technology patents that not
judge that is analyzing each other to path finding faults and
three design approaches. Well, if you're tasked with choosing
the best of the three design approaches, then it kind of
looks like if we were finding faults in each of those three
that that might kind of be sort of like judgment, but actually
finding the faults in the house is that and that will be
followed by a genuine step. Depending on how blatant the
faults are, there might not be a lot of analysis needed actually
because the right path might actually be determined much
higher in the decision tree. Identify limitations of the
current system to justify re architecture project.
Identifying limitations fundamentally and often.
Advocacy propriety doesn't get beyond hashtag beyond the idea
of one favorite project. So that's interesting to you. We
can advocate for one project, but that doesn't apply judgment
really implies a lower level on the set on assessment, a new
methodology enough to religious accuracy for one methodology. So
again, their assessment kind of a family has evaluate or judge
and advocacy for one that he's understanding how to set up set.
assessment project plans focuses on minutiae. That's the whole
idea of not able to see the forest for the trees and we
certainly do that fairly often in our field, or root cause
analysis on a build project is just rehashing unpopular
decisions, same kind of issue where, again, rather than really
feeling judgment as characters that might be for something
called Root Cause Analysis, which did a fine job when we
actually get hung up on just looking at it again, have you
dealt with me on so Jeremy capability my view is even rarer
than synthesis in software engineering, and I think we are
just waiting for genuine in our recruiting and recruiting
practices at all. For example, Microsoft sales interview
questions, and nearly all of them did this, which is higher
on Bloom's Taxonomy than typical interview questions, which are
often more about analysis, but poor business judgment. So
commonly technical sounds that it is a cliche, you spend much
time with the people that is CEO, CEO, CFO, exactly as a
company. They just shake their head is judging demonstrated by
technical staff and I've had numerous experiences where I
would actually confirm that myself. So rather than just kind
of saying, Wow, terrible TV, I'd be happy with that. The $64
question is, then how do we develop good judgment in
software professionals, if they don't buy it naturally, if we're
not recruiting for it? How do we develop that good judgment? So
that's not a weakness of our field. I think the right way to
do that, by the way that I proposed today is what I call
the four factors model. I have another presentation that goes
into a lot of detail on the four factors model. But I will
summarize very briefly today the four factors model basically
says that we have a deep understanding of the project
size or the crop
Okay?
Buying okay.
So I just wanted to check in so there's some comments and
responses about people. Talking and making difficulty hear me
wanting to hear what's being said at the front of the class.
So, maybe we do says a font that clarifies some rules and some
guidelines that we can have for having a respectful environment.
We can discuss ideas to class instead of other things.
So those of you who are interested in watching the
video, you could you could do that.
Okay.
Some ways that we can
developing good judgment good ethical judgment amongst
computer professionals.
So, maybe think of a tree what is the way to organize the tree
that will be making the ethical decisions with prioritizing
ethical decisions
any thoughts? So, question makes sense
so, we often ask
so, what the question is how to do something?
You we ask why something should be done whatever we prioritize
asking why something should be done why should we collect
somebody's data? Pretty much video should be required to
collect the data today makes the experience with the app more
convenient.
Or CFPs he or she that they're up to no good or possibly are
doing it.
So, sell data to other companies or third parties for other
purposes so
I've been too much about keeping quiet nobody wants to talk to me
so, I'm trying to strike a balance here. I'm trying not to
I just tried to encourage discussions where everyone can
participate. So I still value their contributions just
informal dorky ways.
Standing Does that make sense?
Asking why before how I sets
what the question is what do you
think? So, the devices have downstream decisions. Notation
else we're not
it's a question about the Tim Hortons out how to keep track of
collect geographic data about where people are different times
and maybe not case
okay, so tracking.
Tracking us in the app
so maybe in production a malicious and yet we create an
output still tracking people's locations and collecting more
information than we need for our business case. Reasonably app.
So we're violating federal laws. Maybe we're leaving considers
that it's too easy to enable those features that either use
the libraries that are available. aren't aren't
developers an ethical consideration is a worthy kind
of warning that in this feature, there was some serious
consequences.
He thought about without too lengthy explanation or likely
scenario.
So we need to understand for analyze you can use arguments
that are made.
So we might think about approaches being in landlines
arguments and one thing.
So I need to be able to find logical fallacies
we can do something because I read on the internet it was a
good thing to do.
So that's the fallacy of appealing to authority.
If we do just that means we're going to end up
doing something well. Being too general, we can say that if if
we talked about slippery slope if we do one thing that's going
to lead to terrible consequences. That's a fallacy
as well.
Have a list from Wikipedia
so a fallacy is the use of invalid or otherwise faulty
reasoning in the construction of an argument.
So we can have an appeal to probability taking something for
granted because it would probably be the case or might
possibly be the case.
Odds are a million to one to this would happen.
The chance is near to zero but it's not zero.
Evening so there's quite a list here.
So when when one load mentioned here is the ad hominem. So every
time you argue we're extending the argument so this position is
faulty because of the Christians advancing the argument instead
of the merits of the case of the of the position.
This one, this is a useless before it's got a few more ads
and I remember
the first example is an example is appeal to authority. Because
most doctors said smoking is bad for you because most doctors say
so.
Red Herring an irrelevant point brought up to divert attention
from the main issue straw man so we
we end up with where we make a case that is intentionally weak.
That's easy to
do. Easy to argue against
equivocation we don't make things clear enough. stated
position clearly. Slippery slope we mentioned hasty
generalization
one person says this So therefore we can say the whole
whole class is in agreement
appeal to authority false dilemma.
So I think that there's only two choices. You either or assert
against us. You have to report this or that
case people in the world I mean to.
bandwagon fallacy which is popular here and we talked about
that a little bit. Yesterday that people are gonna vote for
something
majority of your opinion is, must be true. So that's that's
an example of how let's see.
An appeal to ignorance argues that a claim is true because it
hasn't been proven false.
Having a circular argument. So we made a case by assuming by
accepting position that we're trying to prove
on there's a thumbs up
CrossFit LLC, we've gotten too far. down this road of saying
it. Resources not fair. argument that doesn't hold water.
Appeal to pay an inflated emotions to stay at sway
opinions.
Correlation, causal present. Causal bouncing the causation
equals correlation equals causation.
Something about a group you say?
A certain condition.
This is almost like getting math on the floor
I didn't want to make it.
Say miles condition drink water.
Much.
Appeal to hypocrisy find out someone's inconsistency to skirt
the argument that's the flavor of ad hominem attacking the
person we're we're attacking the argument by attacking the
person.
LCS has learned traction on that shortlist that you learn like
to?
So I realized I didn't think about ethical frameworks. So I'm
going to do that right after class and that'll be
you. Look at your last day
today.
Yeah
Yeah

Responses

What important concept or perspective did you encounter today?

Ethical Judgement in computing professions.
Criteria for Ethical Judgment Models of AI
We watched a video about methods of ethical analysis
Ethics in the world of computer science and data. The problem with ethics is that no one really enforce it in the world of technologies. As discussed, tracking of customers by using an app that does not nessecarily relate to their business is morally wrong. How can companies do better and be left in charge of this? Customer should have a say how their data is being used. Ethics is dificult to follow if people that checks it are the companies itself.
The concept about logical fallacies
The important concept I encountered today is in the realm of computer professionals, the development of ethical judgment is important. We are faced with ethical dilemmas, such as privacy concerns, impact of AIs etc. So, ethical judgment is essential guiding us to better outcome.
important concept from today's lecture is ethical judgment.
Blooms taxonomy and how it impacts software developers.
Ethical judgement for software development - the how and the why
bloom taxonomy is a significant concept of learning.
fallicies
How good ethical judgement can be developed using the bloom's taxonomy. The 6 different stages of the taxonomy and knowing how analysis is an important stage amongst all but if overused could lead to analysis paralysis.
The different types of fallacy
Bloom's Taxnomony
The fact that analysis is as important as judgment
ethical judgement in computer professional
Bloom taxonomy, group conversation, etc
there are 6 different parts of bloom’s taxonomy that help us to make ethical decisions as software engineers. these are. knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and judgement
Today we looked further into Bloom's taxonomy and the 6 levels of thinking. I learned that to really excel at a concept, we must be able to create something from it and being able to recall and comprehend is not enough.
Bloom's taxonomy
The overwhelming lack of asking the question why in the technological world. Knowledge and understanding of how the computer world can be navigated is pondered far more than why a certain decision should be made. It does not matter how, if it works against the benefit of others(morally), the task should be abandoned. So, constantly analyze and if the first decision is the wrong one, there is no more decision to be made.
ethical judgement among computer professionals
Logical fallacies are important to understand in all aspects of thinking, and I enjoyed wondering how they relate to the world of computer science. When we evaluate our decisions about the technology we create, we must be hyper aware of our fallacies in reasoning.
I thought the concepts of logical fallacies while analyzing decision making was very important to consider.
Logical Fallacies
.
ethical judgement
For me it was Ethical judgment
That classmates talking makes learning difficult
When is it okay to collect data from people, and what that data is specifically used for whether that be targeted ads or other information.
Through the video we watched were told to watch yesterday and watched today, the perspective of hiring software engineers on an analysis basis and not implementing higher levels of Bloom's Taxonomy in the hiring process. And then falling into the problem of not having judgment skills because of all the analysis and now diving into the problem of ethical judgment with computing professionals and asking why before how and before analyzing the whole problem instead of making an initial judgment.
Ethical judgement
The most important perspective I encountered today was when we introduced fallacies. It was interesting to see that ethics could be influenced by fallacies and vice versa.
Ethical Judgement among computer professionals
The question: Which question should be asked first ? Ethical judgement requires asking why before how.
ethical judgment among computer scientist
logical fallacies
Methods for ethical analysis
That knowing if something is ethical is more important than how to implement it.
The important concept I encounter today was the methods for ethical analysis and we also learned about how to approach ethical judgement
Bloom's taxonomy hierarchy
Today I learned about the different types of logical fallacies and how to avoid them
The art of speaking allows me to clearly understand the meaning behind every sentence.
I learned about how ethics play into computer programming
The logical fallacies, I've recognized them, however I did not know their names.
Methods of ethical analysis and logical fallacies
I learned about the different levels of Bloom’s taxonomy and how they are used through software engineering.
We watched the video on bloom’s and go through steps to analyse the problem and how our data is used
Ethical Judgement
The most important topic of the today's class was the six points of Bloom's taxonomy
this is key concept by Steve McDonnell's key concept , sound judgmentin pivotal in understandingc project dynamics
in class today, we watched a video on Bloom's taxonomy which focused on synthesis being above analysis in the pyramid
Topic on tim hortons app
In today lecture I believe that the most important thing I adapted is Ethicality. Also, the judgement part of ethics is various aspects is considered.
Today we watched a Steve McConell video regarding Bloom's taxonomy and Judgement.
Today I learned about Methods for Ethical Analysis and Logical fallacies
the important concept i got to learn today was regarding the ethical Judgment and different ways of ethical analysis. also the difference of Ethical Judgement and Analysis , and at last regarding the logical fallacies.
Ethical decision
An important concept or perspective from today is that when it comes to ethics, you always ask “the why” before the “how”. This is important because “the why” is what determines whether or not the action can be determined ethical or not.
Today we watched an podcast and go through judgement vs analysis and few things about the group
Today we covered the video and discussed more about the podxast
ethical judgement and blooms taxonomy in the video
I learned that software engineers/tech people usually focus too much on analyzing. They often think they are using judgement when in reality, they are analyzing.
Blooms taxonomy
Bloom Taxonomy
I did not encounter today.
i got know about a lot about blooms taxonomy and logical fallacy.
who can our technology affect
we need to ask why while making an ethical judgement
Sound software engineering judgment is key in understanding project dynamics and diagnosing failures accurately.
Today's important concept is Bloom's Taxonomy aspects and their importance/contribution to computer science as a whole! We were also introduced to several different logical fallacies, which make arguments invalid.
Ethical judgement requires asking why and how
The most important concept I encountered today is analysis (critical thinking) in bloom’s taxonomy
Different methods for ethical analysis
Methods for ethical analysis. From Mcconnells webinar video
Webinar video
Methods for Ethical Analysis
ethical judgement
how do we develop good ethic in computer professional
Synthesis in bloom's taxonomy
Bloom's Taxonomy and the levels of understanding were the important concepts I learned today
I found ethical judgement most interesting
learning can help you achieve anything .
An important concept we learned today was ethical analysis and the different types of logical fallacies such as: Ad Hominem -- attacking the person making the argument instead of the argument itself; and Strawman -- misrepresenting/exaggerating the opponent's position to make it easier to refute
If we have decided that a particular thing is not ethical it doesn’t matter how do it
A new concept I have learned today is that there exist many well-known fallacies in between the process of discussing ethics.
the 6 different parts of bloom's taxonomy
methods for ethical analysis.
I learned how do we approach ethical judgement by careful analysis of arguments that we made and recognizing logical fallacies.
Logical fallacies
Bloom's Taxonomy pyramid and each of its levels
Synthesis in blooms taxonomy
the bloom's taxonomy and the pyramid
Ethical analysis
List of fallacies
I got to know about how do we develop good ethical judgement in computer professional.
I learned different methods of ethical analysis and logical fallacies.
methods for ethical analysis. From McConnell’s webinar video
Yes
Logical fallacies.
Today one of the most important misconception is cleared that knowledge is not only the thing that we should have, there are lots of other things like analysis synthesis and judgment skills in ethical analysis that one should have.
Today we saw the video of Steve McConnell in class and had decision on topic around that, was the important part of class today.
Ethical judgement
Logical Fallacies
about groups
upcoming assignment
Ethical analysis
Do Generative AIs posses the ability to catch logical fallicies.
How to develop good ethical judgement
The methods for ethical analysis.
McConnell’s webinar video
some new methods of ethical analysis
Ethics is something that needs to be embodied
ethical principles
About machine
We watched Blooms Taxonomy and discussed about Ethical Judgement.
I learned about the different types of fallacies and how recognizing them can help us approach ethical judgement.
One important concept I learned today was the ways in which we should approach ethical judgement. Such methods include a careful analysis of the arguments being made, as well as recognizing logical fallacies in such arguments. I also learned about the various types of logical fallacies such as the straw man fallacy, ad hominem, and appeal to authority.
Bloom's Taxonomy
Introduction to Bloom's taxonomy's concept has made me wonder how a critical thinking human is different from an average one. And the steps involved.
Methods for ethical analysis administration and ethical judgement.
We need to recognize logical fallacies to make ethical judgment.
The important concept I encountered today was ethical analysis.
The bloom´s taxonomy is a very interesting topic to study and analize

Was there anything today that was difficult to understand?

No.
confused about ethical judgement, how that work?
No
No everything in class was understandable and clear.
Nothing today was difficult to understand
Not in particular. Everything was well understood in today's class.
everything was understandable in the class.
Nothing that was difficult to understand, just challenging to wrap your head around.
synthesis and evaluation hierarchy clarification would be great
no
How should I act to uphold public interest?
not yet
which bloom taxonomy is mainly used is it the 1956 or 2001
difference between synthesis layer and create layer
No
no
Synthesis
No
not really, I understood it
Not particularly.
No
.
Not really
Nope. I understood everything perfectly
In bloom, when does someone "qualify" for the next step up
No.
No
Not really, i understood all the concept
No
the concepts were understandable
no
No
No
yes for me ethical frameworks was difficult
Synthesis
something difficult to understand today was Bloom's taxonomy
methods for ethical analysis
No
nope
No
The idea that asking why something is being done is more important than how it can be done. I feel like we don't do things unless we know why we're doing them. Like creating something, we are creating it for a reason. Coding something because we want to get a specific result. I feel like a greater debate is how something CAN be done versus how something SHOULD be done.
There was nothing difficult to understand today.
every thing is clear with the fallacies and blooms taxonomy
No, but I don’t understand the group thing, I already submitted name and id of my members then also we all landed in different groups, which is wrong, because of error in wiki we get a loss.
Nothing
He stresses the importance of astute judgmentfor unravelling project complexities
I didnt quite understand who was the video being referred to
Everything was easy and properly understood.
No everything was pretty much straight and simple.
No.
i wouldn't say difficult but the concepts of Ethical Judgement and analysis are rather quite similar so you need proper understanding of them that a challenging task. .
Bloom's Taxonomy
Everything was easy but I found Formal syllogistic fallacies little challenging, rest all was good enough.
Something a bit difficult to understand was the difference between Analysis and Judgement in Bloom’s Taxonomy in certain situations. For some examples of Analysis, I would label them as Judgement instead.
The Blooms Taxonomy was difficult to understand as it pertains to the idea of a hierarchy of domains for learning. There are many levels with deep content for each one and fully understanding it is somewhat difficult.
I was not able to understand some of the points of judgement vs analysis
No
it was a bit hard to hear at the end of lecture
It was difficult to understand all the logical fallacies and how they relate to making more ethical decisions.
Dr. Hepting's writing was a bit small today so it was a bit hard to read.
Why McConnell considers Creation and Evaluation interchangable at the top of Bloom's Taxonomy.
No
No
There was nothing difficult today.
It was a little difficult for me to understand the steps of taxonomy
not really
ethical judgement in computer professional
Exploring McConnell's "Four Core Influences" framework offers insights into improving software project outcomes.
Today was very straightforward, everything was understood. I am just having trouble reading what's on the board, but that may be due to the distance.
Scrums
No, there was nothing difficult fir me to understand
No
No, everything was quite clear
Everything was good
no
no
No
No, not today.
Nothing much I found ethical framework a bit confusing but after my own research it was sorted out
no
it was difficult to read the board today as the writing was a bit small
No
Today was clear on what we were discussing.
Not that I can think of
no, there was none
I understood the materials today
Difference between analysis and judgment
I understood the topic clearly as the video was very detailed and informative
no
ethical judgment in computer professionals
No
approach of ethical judgement
Ethical frameworks and which approach do we use?
There was nothing that was hard to understand, it was pretty straight forward.
No everything was crystal clear
No
Not really.
Not really for me right now everything was straight forward and easy to understand.
Nothing so far
It was about not much difficult
nothing at all
no
Nope
Fallacies
No not for me.
no
not particularly
On the perspectives of ethics today
nothing
The video was fast
Nothing.
There were not any difficult topics covered in class today.
One thing I found difficult to understand was the quote "ethical judgement requires asking why before how." What does this idea imply, and what kind of situations in computer science ethics could this quote apply to?
No
No
the logical fallacies was little bit tricky.
Maybe we can get some more examples of how to apply this knowledge in real world

Was there anything today about which you would like to know more?

Yes, I would like to know more about logical fallacies.
Ethical Judgment Model Standard Code of Conduct
No
Spotting Logical Fallacies by GPT-3, the original paper is couple years older and now ChatGPT has only gotten better. I wonder how good it has updated and how long would it take to fully recognize them, also on what will happen next.
None so far
If it would be possible for AIs like chatGPT to develop ethical judgement or maybe ignore it?
i will refer the video again to get more info about ethical analysis.
Ethics and how to decide what is morally wrong or right.
Why we use fallacies and why we shouldn't
I would like to learn more about fallacies
ethical judgment
I would like to know more about the process of deciding how and what is ethical in the process of constructing computer programs and solving computer problems. I would also like to learn more about how the logical fallacies apply to things like coding and ethical application of technology to problems.
Is the pyramid rating for the Bloom's taxonomy. The levels rating compared to list leveling where knowledge comes first.
Bloom's Taxnomony
I would like to know more about the Bloom's Taxonomy
How judgement is better than analysis
No
no
Principles of ethical analysis
Today, we discussed the need to analyze ethics in computer professions including analyzing logical fallacies used by people to argue for a particular moral framework. While we did get a list of fallacies, I would like to see more examples of how they would apply to the world of computer science. We can see the "appeal to authority" fallacy would when citing online users, but whatever other instances of that fallacy? Or other fallacies such as "hasty generalization" or "appeal to ignorance"?
Exactly what are those decisions that might lead to abandoning further pondering the subject.
yes, fallacies
I would like to explore how to make moral decisions more, it is an important topic that is very relevant in the programming industry.
Is any fallacy the most dangerous type?
.
logical fallacies
I want know more about ethical judgement
blooms theory
I would like to know more about where our data goes and how it is stored and used by companies/websites.
I would like to know more about more specific ethical judgment examples in the technology world and where breakthroughs and shortfalls have happened, such as stories similar to the Sorcerer's Apprentice.
No
YES, More of the list of Fallacies
yes, discuss this phrase : " Ethical judgement requires asking why before how."
the list of the fallacies
I want a little bit more depth on how to pursue ethical frameworks, especially in regards to ethical dilemmas while already knee-deep in a situation that's ugly as is (say, working for an unethical company where no option is "good"). I feel having to deal with scenario on which you are already on a losing path from the get-go provides more learning experience than a scenario where each next choice is already clear (ex: Just don't track customer data you don't need.)
no
No
How something is determined as being ethical
I would like to get more details regarding ethical frameworks
The steps of project planning
something I would like to learn more about is how logical fallacies play a role in ethics
Learn more about Logical Fallacies
I would like to learn more about how creating software for the purpose of harming others is ethical or not
who makes the decisions about what is ethical in technology?
Everything was clear.
I would like to learn more about how different companies use people’s data in ways that are not ethical such as gathering information not relevant for the company
I would like to know more about ethical analysis
Nothing
yes how he made it clear.
Probably would like to learn about this concept a little in depth
Etical analysis
I want to know more about ethical judgements.
No
I would like to know more about that 15 Logical Fallacies
i shall love to develop more understanding of these Ethical Concepts of computing society.
Difference between Analyzing and Judgment
I found it interesting that the speaker said that Analysis and the above levels are rare skills and that only high-level thinkers have them developed. I wonder if that is true because I find that critical thinking being uncommon can’t be true. If it were true, society would not be that functional. So I would like to know where that information is coming from.
I would like to know more about the four stages and ethics
No
more resources about todays topic would be great
When referring to Bloom's Taxonomy, I would like to know more about how software engineers/tech people focus to improve their weaknesses.
No
I would like to discuss about analysis and synthesis of bloom taxonomy in detail.
No I do not think so.
i would like to know more about logical fallacy.
no
yes i want know more about ethical judgement.
Yes, different aspect of improving software project outcomes
During the webinar, the idea of the Four Factor Model was briefly introduced, but was not discussed in depth. If possible, I would love if we could go over it in class.
How we approach ethical judgment
I would like to know more on the judgement applied to bloom’s taxonomy
More knowledge on ethical analysis
Frame work of ethical decision making
Regarding chatgpt
Logical Fallacies
no
not really
Bloom's taxonomy
I was very intrigued with Bloom's taxonomy and I would like to inquire more details about it,
No
no
n/a
Ways of approaching ethical judgment
I think that digging deeper into these logical fallacies and being able to analyze them in everyday life would be something I'd like to know more about.
We were shown a webinar today but Dr. Hepting cut it off early. I will definitely be going back and watching the video.
Similar examples might make it more interesting to learn about this topic
nothing more
I will take more time to find the examples of that.
Bloom’s taxonomy
I would like to continue to learn about the different logical fallacies and ethical structure rules and how they relate to each other
Blooms taxonomy
more in depth topics about approaching ethical judgment besides recognizing logical fallacies
Nope
about fallacies may be
Yes,I would like to know more about ethical frameworks in detail.
How do we approach ethical arguments when it comes to Information Society? How do we establish what ought to be? From instinct, feeling or rigorous reasoning?
I would like to know more details about different ethical analysis methods.
Frame work of ethical decision making
No
Examples of logical fallacies in action
Yes I would like know more about the skills to make correct judgement.
As mentioned above nothing was difficult today, so for now there is n0othing to discuss.
I would like to know more about the starting points to making ethical judgment
The information was enough
all good
analysis and ethics in detail
I wanted to know more about judgment
Different kinds of fallacies
I would like to know more abt the Historical Background of Logical Fallacies, since I’m really into history.
yes 15 logical fallacies
some more details into analysis
On the ethical manner we should deal with our modern technology
factors affecting decision making
No
No everything was good..Thank you!
I would like to know more about ethical judgement and the Bloom's taxonomy, and how it relates to our discussion about ethical analysis.
I would like to learn more about what kind of ethical decisions need to be made in the field of computer science, and how professionals create the guidelines to manage such controversies.
No
I would like to know more about how ethical thinking can be accomplished in information society
I like to learn more about chatGPT.
Yeah, more examples would be really great

Site built: 2024-11-13 18:05 -0600 • Give feedback about page