Week of | Meetings | Topics | Items of Note |
---|---|---|---|
Mon-06-Jan-2025 | 01 02 | Chapter 1 |
|
Mon-13-Jan-2025 | 03 04 | Chapter 2 |
|
Mon-20-Jan-2025 | 05 06 | Chapter 3 |
|
Mon-27-Jan-2025 | 07 08 | Chapter 4 |
|
Mon-03-Feb-2025 | 09 10 | Chapter 5 |
|
Mon-10-Feb-2025 | 11 12 | Chapter 6 |
|
Mon-17-Feb-2025 | |||
Mon-24-Feb-2025 | 13 14 | Chapter 7 |
Midterm Exam |
Mon-03-Mar-2025 | 15 16 | Chapter 8 |
|
Mon-10-Mar-2025 | 17 18 | Chapter 9 |
|
Mon-17-Mar-2025 | 19 20 | Chapter 10 |
|
Mon-24-Mar-2025 | 21 22 | Chapter 11 |
|
Mon-31-Mar-2025 | 23 24 | Chapter 12 |
|
Mon-07-Apr-2025 | 25 26 | Chapter 13 |
Start with simple.pbrt (also in v4-fileformat page). Change the image size to 1280 x 720, add and place 2 more spheres into the scene (each with a different material). Run with the specified integrator and also with the wavefront integrator for different values of samples per pixel.
Fully document your pbrt file with comments inline that describe all the statements used along with all parameters specified and default values for those parameters not specified
This assignment is worth 6 marks, according to the following rubric:
DePaul Univerity’s Center for Teaching and Learning has a useful resource describing the process of creating rubrics. Your comments about the following rubric are welcome via email
Criterion and Weight | Exemplary | Sufficient | Developing | Needs Improvement |
---|---|---|---|---|
Describe/Document (3) | ||||
Run/Analyse (3) |
Start with this image of the “Desktop Tetrahedron” from 1990 and create a modern version with pbrt. Some sample code to generate a model can be found here. Note that the code as-is generates a triangle not a tetrahedron.
Your image should take inspiration from the original image done in 1990 and feature a fractal tetrahedron modelled with non-diffuse materials on a desktop surface. Include more than 1 light source, one of which is an area light source. You may add other objects on the desktop surface to help demonstrate shadows and other effects, including indirect (diffuse) lighting. The final image should be high resolution (smaller dimension at least 1024).
Explore the input options to generate a high quality image (samples per pixel and samplers). Use the –stats option with pbrt and some analysis of the results (with imgtool diff, for example). Which is best and why?
Fully document your pbrt file with comments inline that describe all the statements used along with all parameters specified and default values for those parameters not specified
This assignment is worth 12 marks, according to the following rubric:
DePaul Univerity’s Center for Teaching and Learning has a useful resource describing the process of creating rubrics. Your comments about the following rubric are welcome via email
Criterion and Weight | Exemplary | Sufficient | Developing | Needs Improvement |
---|---|---|---|---|
Create Scene (6) | ||||
Document/Describe (3) | ||||
Run/Analyse (3) |
Pick a feature in pbrt v4 (see for example changes from v3, one that came up in our class discussions, or you may find inspiration in Exercises from the book labelled with a (2)) and explore its impact.
For those in 805, please select a feature that is associated with a publication.
Fully document your pbrt files with comments inline that describe all the statements used along with all parameters specified and default values for those parameters not specified
This assignment is worth 12 marks, according to the following rubric:
DePaul Univerity’s Center for Teaching and Learning has a useful resource describing the process of creating rubrics. Your comments about the following rubric are welcome via email
Criterion and Weight | Exemplary | Sufficient | Developing | Needs Improvement |
---|---|---|---|---|
Rationale for Selection of Advanced Feature (2) | ||||
Design/Document Exploration (4) | ||||
Run/Analyse (6) |
Choose one of the textbook exercises labelled with a (3).
This assignment is worth 24 marks, according to the following rubric:
DePaul Univerity’s Center for Teaching and Learning has a useful resource describing the process of creating rubrics. Your comments about the following rubric are welcome via email
Criterion and Weight | Exemplary | Sufficient | Developing | Needs Improvement |
---|---|---|---|---|
Code (8) | ||||
Walkthrough (8) | ||||
Demo (8) |